Skip to content

Main Insight

The Transatlantic Reflection Group on Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of "Artificial Intelligence" convened for a second year to draft a manifesto that calls for the effective and legitimate enforcement of laws concerning AI systems.

Working group publishes A Manifesto on Enforcing Law in the Age of AI

October 25, 2022

From June to October 2022, a working group comprised of legal practitioners and academics from both sides of the Atlantic, under the title of Transatlantic Reflection Group on Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence,” convened to draft A Manifesto on Enforcing Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence,” which calls for the effective and legitimate enforcement of laws concerning AI systems. In doing so, it recognizes the important and complementary role of standards and compliance practices. This manifesto builds upon a manifesto produced by the group in 2021, A Manifesto in Defense of Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence.”

Katherine Evans, Nicolas Miailhe, Samuel Curtis, and Denia Psarrou (left to right) present remarks at the launch event hosted by John Cabot University.
Denia Psarrou and Bruce Hedin (left to right) provide responses to the Manifesto at the launch event.

Background

The Transatlantic Reflection Group on Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence” first formed in 2021, including several of TFS team members, and with the support of The Athens Roundtable on AI and the Rule of Law. That year, the group drafted and published their first manifesto, A Manifesto In Defense of Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence,” which focused on the relationship between democratic law-making and technology.

This first manifesto affirmed the need to empower citizens through institutions of countervailing power, called for cooperation between technologists and policy communities on both sides of the Atlantic, and stressed that technological solutionism must not supplant the painstaking work of democracy. Over 125 individuals signed the first manifesto, including prominent political leaders, academics exploring the implications of AI on the rule of law, developers of AI systems, and practitioners designing AI governance mechanisms.

Francesco Lapenta, Paul Nemitz, Wendell Wallach (front, left to right) and Niki Iliadis (on screen) present opening remarks at the launch event.

Reconvening to produce a second manifesto

A short year on, many of the challenges addressed in the first manifesto are ever more acute. Technology firms are developing and deploying AI systems poised to massively reshape our societies, while governments—many of which have committed to the OECD AI Principles and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI—have yet to demonstrate adherence to these commitments or fulfillment of their duties to citizens through adequate oversight. Though there have been incremental developments toward legislating rules for AI systems, including the proposed EU AI Act and a limited number of US state laws, there is a lack of meaningful constraints on the deployment of AI systems or meaningful progress toward a level of transparency that might make possible trust in the outcomes that AI systems produce.

With these challenges in mind, the Transatlantic Reflection Group on Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence” reconvened in June 2022, to begin working on a second manifesto that shifts focus from the design of law in the age of AI to the enforcement of law.

Between June to September 2022, the group met in a series of virtual meetings, conducting writing and editing asynchronously. With the support of the Institute of Future and Innovation Studies at John Cabot University—an American university in Rome—the group came to a final consensus in meetings on 8-9 October and publicly presented the Manifesto on 10 October 2022 in Rome. More details about the launch event can be found here.

Contributors to the Transatlantic Reflection Group on Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence” in 2022 were (listed alphabetically by last name): Julie Cohen, Samuel Curtis, Nicolas Economou, Katherine Evans, Bruce Hedin, Niki Iliadis, Anja Kaspersen, Francesco Lapenta, Nicolas Miailhe, Paul Nemitz, Denia Psarrou, Stefano Quintarelli, Marc Rotenberg, Sarah Spiekermann, Thomas Streinz, and Wendell Wallach.

Katherine Evans reads from the Manifesto at the launch event.

Recommendations

A Manifesto on Enforcing Law in the Age of “Artificial Intelligence” offers 10 recommendations for addressing the enforcement challenges shared across transatlantic stakeholders. These recommendations are published to share practically feasible steps that policymakers and regulators can take to create enforcement regimes that, in the age of AI, are both effective throughout the lifecycle of AI systems, and consistent with democratic values.

  1. Implement international agreements on AI and translate them into national laws and standards.
  2. Establish new laws and governance mechanisms for AI.
  3. Establish and enforce clear prohibitions for deployments of AI systems that violate fundamental human rights.
  4. Support coordinated efforts for technical standards, benchmarking, and certifications of compliance.
  5. Build capacities across institutions to effectively enforce laws.
  6. Ensure that public interest supersedes countervailing assertions of intellectual property rights.
  7. Launch a transatlantic observatory for reporting AI incidents to help hold developers and deployers of AI systems accountable.
  8. Empower academia, civil society, and the public to participate meaningfully in oversight and enforcement.
  9. Invest in the development of trustworthy AI tools to assist in the enforcement of regulatory law.
  10. Sanction corporations that violate laws or use AI to undermine the rule of law.

More detailed descriptions of the recommendations can be found in the manifesto. Those who support these recommendations are invited to sign the manifesto.

Next steps

A broader discussion with the participation of national and international policymakers, industry, the legal community, and other stakeholders is planned to take place at the fourth edition of The Athens Roundtable on AI and the Rule of Law on December 1st and 2nd, 2022 at the European Parliament in Brussels. Click here to learn more and register.

Team members

Related resources

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

Countries outside the U.S.–China AI race can build the verification technologies needed to make an international agreement to slow AI development enforceable. This memo suggests research priorities.

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

Across Europe, there is growing appetite for locating large compute capacity at home. This post maps what the benefits' proponents claim such a buildout might bring and the key open questions these claims stand or fall on.

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

AI rules cannot reliably protect people when compliance cannot be checked. In a new CIGI policy brief co-authored by George Gor (TFS) and Kofi Yeboah (Mozilla), AI-enabled weapons in Africa serve as a case study of how procurement and regional verification can test supplier claims, reduce risks to civilians and...

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

AI incidents are scaling fast, and coordinated global governance is lagging behind. This report proposes addressing this challenge through the development of internationally-distributed incident management infrastructure. Our recommendations aim to enable governments, multilateral bodies, and frontier AI companies to jointly detect, prepare for, and respond to AI incidents across jurisdictions.

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

The EU's AI Act and Code of Practice requires providers of the most advanced AI models to meet the ‘state of the art’ (SOTA) in safety and security. In a new policy memo, we argue that SOTA is best understood as a process-driven concept, advanced by the broader expert ecosystem.

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

Highlights from Tech Policy Press article “The EU AI Act is Not Ready for Agents,” examining how the EU AI Act applies to AI agents and governance challenges.