Skip to content

Main Insight

The Future Society has been advocating for regulatory sandboxes to be implemented via the EU AI Act and designed a three-phase roll out program.

TFS champions Regulatory Sandboxes in the EU AI Act

June 28, 2022

What are regulatory sandboxes?

Since early 2020, The Future Society (TFS) has been advocating for regulatory sandboxes to be implemented in the EU legislative ecosystem. Regulatory sandboxes are programs that enable entrepreneurs to test new products and services in the market while maintaining close rapport with regulators. Sometimes, entrepreneurs’ regulatory obligations are temporarily reduced to provide authorities the chance to understand the technological environment and design and enforce more effective, tailor-made safeguards.

If properly designed and managed, regulatory sandboxes can fulfill multiple functions, such as providing:

  • Monitored regulatory flexibility for entrepreneurs to “live” test their innovations on the market.
  • Regulators with a better understanding of cutting-edge technologies, value chains, and business models.
  • Customers (B2B or B2C) with the confidence to do business with disruptive technology providers.

Regulatory sandboxes have proved beneficial across a broad range of sectors undergoing digitalization over the past 15 years, including finance, energy, health, transportation, and legal services. However, their effectiveness—for regulators, entrepreneurs, and society at large—depends on careful design, engineering, and management. For example, undue influence on the selection process, lack of safeguards, or miscalibrated scope could undermine the rule of law or create anti-competitive distortions. Regulatory sandboxes are also resource-intensive, so return on investment must be carefully assessed. That is why TFS has advocated not only for the implementation of regulatory sandboxes but also for specific design features to improve their likelihood of success.

Our work on regulatory sandboxes in the EU

In February 2020, the European Commission published a White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. In response, TFS published a memo titled “Experimentation, testing & audit as a cornerstone for trust and excellence,” advocating for numerous changes including the addition of regulatory sandboxes, which, notably, were not referenced in the white paper.

When the European Commission’s proposed AI Act was unveiled in April 2021, we were pleased to see regulatory sandboxes included as a measure to “reduce the regulatory burden and to support Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (‘SMEs’) and start-ups.” However, details concerning the rollout plan were left open for discussion. To aid in clarifying these concepts, in August 2021, TFS published a memo titled “Trust in Excellence & Excellence in Trust”, which called for a more ambitious regulatory sandbox system, among other recommendations, such as testing and experimentation facilities, national- to EU-level information flows, and incident reporting, to foster innovative and agile governance.

Sandboxes without the quicksand

In February 2022, as the European Commission and the French Presidency of the Council both began to reflect on the design of the sandboxes system, TFS published a memo titled “Sandboxes without the quicksand: making EU AI sandboxing work for regulators, entrepreneurs and society.” In this memo, aimed to help policymakers implement regulatory sandboxes, we proposed a three-phase program:

  • Phase 1: Generate demand for sandboxes (2023-2024). Rolling out the basic features of the sandboxing ecosystem to generate demand for sandboxes from both entrepreneurs and regulators.
  • Phase 2: Boost regulators’ capacity & foresight and customers’ confidence (2025). Investing in the “institutional infrastructure” surrounding regulatory sandboxes to tap the value that a sandboxing system can generate for regulators and society at large.
  • Phase 3: Assess, improve, streamline and scale (2026). Evaluate and improve the ecosystem based on information generated by impact assessments, documentation processes, and the experience of the individuals involved. Determine whether the ecosystem is fulfilling its objectives, how to address any shortcomings, and what budget should be allocated for its near-term future.

In July 2022, our proposal was further institutionalized in a communication of the European Commission, The New European Innovation Agenda:

The Commission will issue a guidance document in the first half of 2023 that will clarify relevant use cases of regulatory sandboxes, test beds and living labs in order to support policymakers and innovators in their approach to experimentation in the EU. A staff working document will provide an overview of the main existing experimentation clauses and regulatory sandboxes in EU law, and support will be provided for innovators to identify areas and establish an experimentation space, such as regulatory sandboxes, living labs or test beds, which could facilitate the deployment of disruptive technologies through future calls

The Commission will also support the creation of the GovTech Incubator in 2023: an agreement for cross-border collaboration between digitalisation agencies for the deployment of innovative digital government solutions through Digital Europe programme.

In addition, the Commission will pilot an Innovation-Friendly Regulations Advisory Group, a group that provides upstream policy advice on new technologies in relation to the regulatory environment and business models, to focus on the use of advanced digital technologies within public services. This will include, in particular, the implementation of selected use cases in the public sector and interoperability requirements for digital solutions adopted by public administrations in the EU. Advice from the group may also support actions and programmes related to public procurement and experimentation with advanced emerging digital technologies by public authorities in controlled environments (regulatory sandboxes).”

We are honored that our research has been well-received by policymakers and that our recommendations for the design and operationalization of sandboxes are carried into negotiations within the European Parliament. We look forward to continuing to contribute to the development of regulatory sandboxes, among other innovative elements of the EU AI Act, as they are ironed out.

Are you an EU regulator or policymaker interested in learning more about regulatory sandboxes? Contact Nicolas Moës at

Feature image by DeepMind on Unsplash.

Team members

Nicolas Moës

Samuel Curtis

Related resources

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

TFS submitted a list of clauses to govern the development of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS) to the U.S. NIST Generative AI Public Working Group (NIST GAI-PWG).

Response to U.S. OSTP Request for Information on National Priorities for AI

Response to U.S. OSTP Request for Information on National Priorities for AI

Our response put forward national priorities focused on security standards, measurement and evaluation frameworks, and an industry-wide code of conduct for GPAIS development.

Strengthening the AI operating environment

Strengthening the AI operating environment

In a paper published at the International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace (Legal AIIA), Dr. Bruce Hedin and Samuel Curtis present an argument for distributed competence as a means to mitigate risks posed by AI systems.

Response to U.S. NTIA AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment

Response to U.S. NTIA AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment

Our response emphasized the need for scrutiny in the design and development of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS). We encourage the implementation of third-party assessments and audits, contestability tools for impacted persons, and a horizontal regulatory approach toward GPAIS.

Policy achievements in the EU AI Act

Policy achievements in the EU AI Act

The draft AI Act approved by the European Parliament contains a number of provisions for which TFS has been advocating, including a special governance regime tailored to general-purpose AI systems. Collectively, these operationalize safety, fairness, accountability, and transparency in the development and deployment of AI systems.

Byte-sized updates & we’re hiring!

Byte-sized updates & we’re hiring!

The pace of AI developments has kept us busy, and we’re excited to share what we’ve been up to in this quarter’s newsletter.