Skip to content

Main Insight

Our response emphasized the need for scrutiny in the design and development of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS). We encourage the implementation of third-party assessments and audits, contestability tools for impacted persons, and a horizontal regulatory approach toward GPAIS.

Response to U.S. NTIA AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment

June 19, 2023

On June 12th, The Future Society submitted a response to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s (NTIA) Request for Comment on AI accountability policies. In our response, we emphasize our concern about the rate of development and deployment of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS), which are already exhibiting safety and security vulnerabilities, and posing threats to human safety and fundamental values.

In summary, our response puts forward the following recommendations:

  • Strengthen accountability throughout the entire lifecycle of an AI system, with particular scrutiny applied in the design and development stages of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS).
  • Foster a trustworthy AI assurance ecosystem by promoting third-party assessments and audits, and contestability tools for impacted persons.
  • Apply a horizontal, cross-sectoral approach to federal policies and regulations for general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS).

We’re committed to steering AI development toward a future where AI benefits all of humanity, not just a select few. We’re grateful for the chance to share our vision with the U.S. NTIA and look forward to continuing to work towards robust and inclusive AI governance frameworks that protect and uphold human safety and fundamental values.

Related resources

Heavy is the Head that Wears the Crown

Heavy is the Head that Wears the Crown

In this blueprint, we explain why a tiered approach makes sense in the EU AI Act and how to build a risk-based tiered regulatory regime for GPAI – the technicalities involved, which requirements should be imposed on their corresponding tiers, and how to enforce them.

Giving Agency to the AI Act

Giving Agency to the AI Act

Earlier this year, we conducted research comparing different institutional models for an EU-level body to oversee the implementation and enforcement of the AI Act. We're pleased to share our memo: Giving Agency to the AI Act.

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

TFS submitted a list of clauses to govern the development of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS) to the U.S. NIST Generative AI Public Working Group (NIST GAI-PWG).

Response to U.S. OSTP Request for Information on National Priorities for AI

Response to U.S. OSTP Request for Information on National Priorities for AI

Our response put forward national priorities focused on security standards, measurement and evaluation frameworks, and an industry-wide code of conduct for GPAIS development.

Strengthening the AI operating environment

Strengthening the AI operating environment

In a paper published at the International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace (Legal AIIA), Dr. Bruce Hedin and Samuel Curtis present an argument for distributed competence as a means to mitigate risks posed by AI systems.

Policy achievements in the EU AI Act

Policy achievements in the EU AI Act

The draft AI Act approved by the European Parliament contains a number of provisions for which TFS has been advocating, including a special governance regime tailored to general-purpose AI systems. Collectively, these operationalize safety, fairness, accountability, and transparency in the development and deployment of AI systems.