Skip to content

Main Insight

The report was released at the European Parliament on September 2018.

Report from our Global Civic Debate on Governing the Rise of Artificial Intelligence

September 26, 2018

The Future Society coordinated an unprecedented 7-month civic consultation open to the public to better understand the rise, dynamics and consequences of AI (www.aicivicdebate.org). Engineered through the online collective intelligence platform Assembly and over 20 global events, we assembled a diverse community of over 2,000 participants from around the world, with over 3,300 contributions in five languages (English, Chinese, French, Japanese and Russian), to garner novel perspectives on the governance of AI. The report was released at the European Parliament on September 2018.

The full report and executive summary are available in English here: 

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Report

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Executive Summary – English

Given the diversity of contributions to this Global Civic Debate, we have also translated the executive summary in 4 other languages:

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Executive Summary – Chinese

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Executive Summary – French

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Executive Summary – Japanese

The Future Society – Global Civic Debate Executive Summary – Russian

Related resources

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

Countries outside the U.S.–China AI race can build the verification technologies needed to make an international agreement to slow AI development enforceable. This memo suggests research priorities.

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

Across Europe, there is growing appetite for locating large compute capacity at home. This post maps what the benefits' proponents claim such a buildout might bring and the key open questions these claims stand or fall on.

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

AI rules cannot reliably protect people when compliance cannot be checked. In a new CIGI policy brief co-authored by George Gor (TFS) and Kofi Yeboah (Mozilla), AI-enabled weapons in Africa serve as a case study of how procurement and regional verification can test supplier claims, reduce risks to civilians and...

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

AI incidents are scaling fast, and coordinated global governance is lagging behind. This report proposes addressing this challenge through the development of internationally-distributed incident management infrastructure. Our recommendations aim to enable governments, multilateral bodies, and frontier AI companies to jointly detect, prepare for, and respond to AI incidents across jurisdictions.

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

The EU's AI Act and Code of Practice requires providers of the most advanced AI models to meet the ‘state of the art’ (SOTA) in safety and security. In a new policy memo, we argue that SOTA is best understood as a process-driven concept, advanced by the broader expert ecosystem.

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

Highlights from Tech Policy Press article “The EU AI Act is Not Ready for Agents,” examining how the EU AI Act applies to AI agents and governance challenges.