Skip to content

Main Insight

On November 12th, 2021, an update on our work on the 'AI-Powered Immediate Response to Pandemics' project was presented at the GPAI Paris Summit 2021.

Progress with GPAI AI & Pandemic Response Subgroup at Paris Summit 2021

November 12, 2021

Since July of this year, The Future Society has been working with the AI & Pandemic Response Subgroup of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI) to develop a ‘Living Repository’ of AI initiatives with the potential to combat COVID-19 and other future pandemics. This research builds upon last year’s collaboration that culminated in a report: Responsible AI in Pandemic Response. Our progress in this project, described below, was presented on November 12th, 2021 at the GPAI Paris Summit 2021.

This research project began as a collaboration between The Future Society, the OECD AI Policy Observatory, and GPAI, by applying the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems to classify AI initiatives based on their technical characteristics. AI systems developers, who had created or repurposed an AI system to aid in COVID-19 response, were invited to complete a survey shared in a public announcement. A total of 66 initiatives were identified between desktop research and survey responses.

Watch the presentation of the AI & Pandemic Response Working Group with Drug Discovery Committee lead Alice Oh and contributing authors Allison Cohen and Elliot Layne, and Immediate Response leads Paul Suetens and Michael O’Sullivan and project lead Samuel Curtis.

We then worked with Immediate Response Committee to build upon the OECD Framework to develop a more impact-focused set of criteria, including:

  • Background of the initiative (name, sources, objective/purpose)
  • Origin (including organization(s), locality)
  • Categorization (type of approach / AI method)
  • Scope (domain, target users/operators and beneficiaries, geographic coverage)
  • Data (description of the dataset in use including demographics, target population, size, collection timeframe, any public access links)

The 66 AI systems have been classified using this framework to create the Living Repository. This is being shared in an open ‘work-in-progress’ format in reflection of the immediate needs of the pandemic for those that may find it useful as a resource.

Using these classifications, the Immediate Response Committee has conducted assessments of initiatives’ intrinsic scalability and their potential to mitigate the current and future pandemics, to narrow the 66 identified initiatives into a shortlist of 26, of which 11 have initially been selected as candidates for potential partnerships with the AI & Pandemic Response Subgroup and GPAI more widely. 

We are pleased to share another document, Update on Living Repository: Summaries of Top Initiatives, which contains summaries of the initial selected 11 initiatives. They include AI systems that have been trained to: 

  • predict the distances and angles between pairs of proteins’ amino acid residues;
  • determine the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on COVID-19
  • identify individuals who are at the greatest risk of heightened vulnerability to COVID-19, based on individuals’ pre-existing medical conditions;
  • provide users with personalized daily COVID-19 “risk scores” associated with regular activities;
  • organize both structured and unstructured COVID-19 data into a knowledge graph that can be navigated and queried to retrieve information;
  • provide a country-level risk modeling framework intended to assist the government and individuals in making informed decisions;
  • quickly and accurately detect the presence of COVID-19 in thoracic CT scans;
  • model the spread of COVID-19 based on the prevalence of mask-wearing in a population;
  • identify, track, and analyze events associated with COVID-19 via mentions on online news articles and social media posts;
  • aggregate and clean various sources of US pandemic-related raw data to produce COVID-19 “indicators” for “nowcasting” (situational awareness) and short-term forecasting;
  • allow users to view current occupancy rates of hospitals across the US and recommendations for intra-state patient transfers based on current occupancy rates.

In early 2022, we will be bookending this project by updating the Living Repository and sharing an additional 15 summaries. We intend that the analysis will then be used to help inform the Immediate Response Committee’s partnerships approach in 2022, but should also provide a useful tool and model for the critical evaluation of AI initiatives within the ongoing and in future pandemics.

Team members

Samuel Curtis

Nicolas Miailhe

Related resources

Where Do We Draw the Line? Inside the IASEAI Expert Workshop on AI Red Lines

Where Do We Draw the Line? Inside the IASEAI Expert Workshop on AI Red Lines

Our expert workshop at IASEAI in February 2026 explored how to get to enforceable AI red lines. Three things are required: agreement on thresholds, verification infrastructure, and diplomatic coalition-building. Progress on all three is within reach.

Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks

Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks

At The Seventh Edition of Athens Roundtable in London in December 2025, a closed-door dialogue convened 76 experts to discuss operational AI red lines. Participants identified major risk clusters and emphasized enforceable technical thresholds, verification mechanisms, and multilateral standards grounded in existing international law to prevent severe harms from powerful...

Serious AI Incident Prevention and Preparedness

Serious AI Incident Prevention and Preparedness

At the Seventh Edition of The Athens Roundtable, experts explored how governments, industry, and civil society can prevent, monitor, report, prepare for and respond to AI incidents. With 2025 seeing record incidents, participants emphasized standardized reporting, secure data sharing, robust monitoring, and proactive governance to prevent crises and strengthen global...

Ten AI Governance Priorities: Survey of 44 Civil Society Organizations

Ten AI Governance Priorities: Survey of 44 Civil Society Organizations

Through our survey, 44 civil society organizations—including research institutes, think tanks, and advocacy groups—ranked ten potential AI governance mechanisms.

Closing the Gap: Five Recommendations for Improving the Third Draft of the EU Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI

Closing the Gap: Five Recommendations for Improving the Third Draft of the EU Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI

The EU Code of Practice helps providers of General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Models with systemic risks to comply with the EU AI Act. Our preliminary analysis of the third draft of the Code identifies opportunities for improvement in five key areas.

Did the Paris AI Action Summit Deliver on the Priorities of Citizens and Experts? 

Did the Paris AI Action Summit Deliver on the Priorities of Citizens and Experts? 

Our official consultation for the AI Action Summit delivered a clear message: Harnessing AI's potential requires "constructive vigilance." We examine specific priorities identified during the consultation by citizens and experts, evaluating what the Summit successfully delivered and where gaps remain.