Skip to content

Main Insight

Over 4,400 participants from over 140 countries registered for the online course exploring AI's impact in and for justice.

MOOC on AI and the Rule of Law: Successful Completion of the Pilot Phase

May 12, 2022

On March 14th, 2022, The Future Society and UNESCO—with the support of the National Judicial College, CETIC.br/NIC.br, and IEEE SA—launched a global introductory MOOC on AI’s adoption and impact on the rule of law.

Structured around six modules, the course unpacks the opportunities and risks of the adoption of AI technologies across justice systems and AI’s impact on the administration of justice, covering a range of human rights, ethics, and governance issues.

Six weeks after its launch, the course reached a total of 4,432 participants from over 140 countries and successfully delivered on its objectives, helping judicial operators around the world become better-equipped stewards of human rights, democratic principles, and the rule of law.

Lawyers and judges represent more than half of the participants, comprising the largest subset of the professions of enrollees. Fifty percent of the participants in the course were women.

Some key indicators, following the six-week pilot phase, are provided below:

Key Indicators (as of April 22nd, 2022)
6 modules delivered by 21 lecturers, including geographical representation from all 5 UNESCO Regions and 52% female representation
Accessibility in 7 languages: English, French, Spanish, Portuguese,  Russian, Chinese, and Arabic
24 educational videos, 6 powerpoint slides, 34 use cases and case examples, 21 lecture summaries, 6 reading lists, 6 discussion fora, and 6 quizzes
4,432 course registrants, from over 140 countries (3,675 registrants joined from countries outside Europe or North America)
50% female course registrants, amongst those who chose to disclose their gender
725 certificates of completion were distributed during the six-week pilot phase

According to a course evaluation survey, a majority of participants strongly agreed that, after taking the course, they had a better understanding of artificial intelligence, its implications in justice systems, and its impact on human rights.

“[The course is] an eye opener, just to see how other jurisdictions are also dealing with the issue of the rule of law. It was definitely valuable to me … having gone through this particular training, I think there is a need for continuous training on the rule of law because things keep changing.” –

Hon. Catherine W. Mburu, Senior Resident Magistrate serving in the Judiciary of Kenya

“Of the many lessons learned, I would point out as the most relevant the importance of ‘molding’ the use of AI within the Judiciary to our core ethical values through a human rights-based approach. If we as judges choose to ‘turn our face’ and let the ‘tech guys’ handle it, ignoring the way AI will be implemented within the Judiciary, our future generations will have us to blame for the probable distancing the decision-making of tomorrow will have from our humanistic principles we appreciate today.”

Sergio Torres Teixeira, Justice in the 6th Regional Labour Court of the Brazilian Labour Justice, in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Professor of Law at the Recife Law Schol, of the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) and at the Catholic University of Pernambuco. PhD in Law (UFPE, 2004)

Apart from the course content, the initial six-week phase of the MOOC was accompanied by two interactive sessions around the digitalization of justice systems and data protection, AI-based judicial decision-making and the role of human oversight, as well as an active online forum for the exchange of knowledge among judicial operators worldwide.

Ideated by The Athens Roundtable‘s Working Group on Judicial and Legal Education on AI, the course reflects The Roundtable’s capacity to spur and co-produce capacity-building projects, in addition to serving as a multi-stakeholder forum that advances the international AI policy dialogue in support of human rights and the democratic order.

The course was offered as part of UNESCO’s Judges’ Initiative which has trained over 23,000 judicial operators since 2014. Through publications, toolkits, and both online and on-the-ground training, the initiative builds the capacities of judicial operators to engage with emerging challenges and protect fundamental human rights and freedom of expression. 

The MOOC is still available online and can be taken as a self-paced course.

Related resources

The Fifth Edition of The Athens Roundtable to take place in Washington, D.C.

The Fifth Edition of The Athens Roundtable to take place in Washington, D.C.

The Fifth Edition of The Athens Roundtable on AI and the Rule of Law will convene in Washington D.C. on November 30th and December 1st, 2023, to examine the risks associated with foundation models and generative AI, and explore governance mechanisms that could serve to reduce these risks.

A Blueprint for the European AI Office

A Blueprint for the European AI Office

We are releasing a blueprint for the proposed European AI Office, which puts forward design features that would enable the Office to implement and enforce the EU AI Act, with a focus on addressing transnational issues like general-purpose AI.

Model Protocol for Electronically Stored Information (ESI)

Model Protocol for Electronically Stored Information (ESI)

The Future Society, with support from IEEE, has developed a model protocol to assist parties seeking to establish the trustworthiness of advanced tools used to review electronically stored information (ESI) in legal discovery.

Heavy is the Head that Wears the Crown: A risk-based tiered approach to governing General-Purpose AI

Heavy is the Head that Wears the Crown: A risk-based tiered approach to governing General-Purpose AI

In this blueprint, we explain why a tiered approach makes sense in the EU AI Act and how to build a risk-based tiered regulatory regime for GPAI – the technicalities involved, which requirements should be imposed on their corresponding tiers, and how to enforce them.

Giving Agency to the AI Act

Giving Agency to the AI Act

Earlier this year, we conducted research comparing different institutional models for an EU-level body to oversee the implementation and enforcement of the AI Act. We're pleased to share our memo: Giving Agency to the AI Act.

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

Response to NIST Generative AI Public Working Group Request for Resources

TFS submitted a list of clauses to govern the development of general-purpose AI systems (GPAIS) to the U.S. NIST Generative AI Public Working Group (NIST GAI-PWG).