Skip to content

Main Insight

Published in Oxford’s International Data Privacy Law Journal, our article offers an ethical and legal framework to govern the development of contact tracing apps in order to build trust and social acceptability.

Our work / International AI Governance /

Digital contact tracing against COVID-19: a governance framework to build trust

June 8, 2021

Since the start of the pandemic, countries around the world have been confronted to an unprecedented health crisis, raising complex social, economical, and ethical challenges. To mitigate the spread of COVID-19, and as a way to transition out of complete lockdown, several Latin American countries have deployed or are considering deploying digital contact tracing applications.

Download our report here.

However, worldwide concerns have been raised over the widespread and generalized adoption of digital contact tracing applications. Concerns include their purpose, performance, impacts on privacy, data protection, human agency, and risks of stigmatization. Many of these emanate from mistrust in public authorities or technology firms, and fear of establishing mass surveillance. Disinformation and the lack of clear ethical, legal, and technical safeguards have polarized the public debate at a time when we need to build trust, and should not have to sacrifice civil liberties for public health.

There is therefore a pressing need to co-design governance mechanisms that capture the health benefits of contact tracing applications while mitigating their potential risks and adverse effects. The urgency of the situation should not impact our collective ability to make informed decisions, and to responsibly navigate potential tensions between public health, safety, and civil liberties. Evidence suggests that the widespread adoption and efficacy of contact tracing applications is reliant on public trust and social acceptability, further reinforcing the need for ethical and legal frameworks governing their development.

Read our article,  co-authored by Sacha Alanoca, Nicolas Guetta-Jeanrenaud, Isabela Ferrari, Nyasha Weinberg, R. Buse Çetin, Nicolas Miailhe.

Share

Related resources

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

Countries outside the U.S.–China AI race can build the verification technologies needed to make an international agreement to slow AI development enforceable. This memo suggests research priorities.

Read

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

Across Europe, there is growing appetite for locating large compute capacity at home. This post maps what the benefits' proponents claim such a buildout might bring and the key open questions these claims stand or fall on.

Read

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

AI rules cannot reliably protect people when compliance cannot be checked. In a new CIGI policy brief co-authored by George Gor (TFS) and Kofi Yeboah (Mozilla), AI-enabled weapons in Africa serve as a case study of how procurement and regional verification can test supplier claims, reduce risks to civilians and...

Read

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

AI incidents are scaling fast, and coordinated global governance is lagging behind. This report proposes addressing this challenge through the development of internationally-distributed incident management infrastructure. Our recommendations aim to enable governments, multilateral bodies, and frontier AI companies to jointly detect, prepare for, and respond to AI incidents across jurisdictions.

Read

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

The EU's AI Act and Code of Practice requires providers of the most advanced AI models to meet the ‘state of the art’ (SOTA) in safety and security. In a new policy memo, we argue that SOTA is best understood as a process-driven concept, advanced by the broader expert ecosystem.

Read

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

Highlights from Tech Policy Press article “The EU AI Act is Not Ready for Agents,” examining how the EU AI Act applies to AI agents and governance challenges.

Read