Skip to content

Main Insight

We are releasing a blueprint for the proposed European AI Office, which puts forward design features that would enable the Office to implement and enforce the EU AI Act, with a focus on addressing transnational issues like general-purpose AI.

A Blueprint for the European AI Office

October 17, 2023

The latest discussions on the governance of foundation models and general purpose AI often ask “How can we enforce rules that affect cutting-edge foreign providers of such an opaque technology?”

Today, we’re publishing a blueprint for the European AI Office – a centralised institution that could be established through the European Union (EU) AI Act – responsible for overseeing and supporting the implementation and enforcement of the regulation across the EU, notably on transnational issues like general purpose AI.

This work follows our “Giving Agency to the EU AI Act” memo, which analysed different institutional models on their suitability in enforcing the AI Act at the EU level. In particular, we compared a board, which would have relatively limited authority, to an agency, which would have much more enforcement power. In this blueprint, we presume that, as reflected by the European Parliament’s June 2023 negotiating position, the AI Act would establish an AI Office (which, in terms of authority, sits somewhere between an agency and a board).

With this in mind, we sought to answer the question: What mechanisms would enable the European AI Office to function effectively, efficiently, coherently and legitimately? We identify mechanisms that would enable the AI Office to satisfy these objectives. We conducted desk research and expert interviews to analyse various design features of relevant institutions and the proposed European AI Office. Based on a review of historical examples and solicitation of expert opinion, we developed recommendations for the AI Office, spanning legal, structural, financial, functional, and behavioural mechanisms.

Our recommendations are summarised in the figure below:

Team members

Samuel Curtis

Nick Moës

Nick Moës

Felicity Reddel

Related resources

Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks

Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks

At The Seventh Edition of Athens Roundtable in London in December 2025, a closed-door dialogue convened 76 experts to discuss operational AI red lines. Participants identified major risk clusters and emphasized enforceable technical thresholds, verification mechanisms, and multilateral standards grounded in existing international law to prevent severe harms from powerful...

Serious AI Incident Prevention and Preparedness

Serious AI Incident Prevention and Preparedness

At the Seventh Edition of The Athens Roundtable, experts explored how governments, industry, and civil society can prevent, monitor, report, prepare for and respond to AI incidents. With 2025 seeing record incidents, participants emphasized standardized reporting, secure data sharing, robust monitoring, and proactive governance to prevent crises and strengthen global...

Closing the Gap: Five Recommendations for Improving the Third Draft of the EU Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI

Closing the Gap: Five Recommendations for Improving the Third Draft of the EU Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI

The EU Code of Practice helps providers of General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Models with systemic risks to comply with the EU AI Act. Our preliminary analysis of the third draft of the Code identifies opportunities for improvement in five key areas.

Closing 2024, Looking Ahead to 2025: A Message from The Future Society’s Executive Director

Closing 2024, Looking Ahead to 2025: A Message from The Future Society’s Executive Director

A look at our work in 2024 and The Future Society's ten year anniversary, as well as what's ahead for AI governance in 2025.

The Future Society Newsletter: November 2024

The Future Society Newsletter: November 2024

In This Newsletter: Preview of The Athens Roundtable on Artificial Intelligence and the Rule of Law on December 9. Interim findings from our expert consultation for France’s 2025 AI Action Summit. Our report on AI Safety Institutes’ collaboration. OpEd on the GPAI Code of Practice for the EU AI Act.

Delivering Solutions: An Interim Report of Expert Insights for France’s 2025 AI Action Summit

Delivering Solutions: An Interim Report of Expert Insights for France’s 2025 AI Action Summit

We share initial findings from 84 global experts who contributed to the first part of our open consultation for France's 2025 AI Action Summit, revealing four key shifts needed in AI governance and concrete recommendations for action. The complete analysis will be presented at The Athens Roundtable on December 9.