Skip to content

Main Insight

Our report examines how the AISI Network can be structured and strategically integrated into the broader AI governance ecosystem to effectively fulfill its mandate toward secure, safe, and trustworthy AI.

Weaving a Safety Net: Key Considerations for How the AI Safety Institute Network Can Advance Multilateral Collaboration

November 15, 2024


As the capabilities of artificial intelligence increase and its impact on society continues to grow, governments worldwide are establishing mechanisms to manage the risks and harness the benefits of these transformative technologies. Among the most prominent of these initiatives is the creation of AI Safety Institutes (AISIs)—specialized, government-funded entities tasked with overseeing the safe development of AI systems, especially those on the frontier of technological advancement.

A significant step toward multilateral coordination was achieved with the launch of the International Network of AI Safety Institutes (AISI Network) in May 2024. The Network brings together members from diverse regions, including Australia, Canada, the European Union, France, Japan, Kenya, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Its inaugural formal gathering, scheduled for November 20-21, 2024, in San Francisco, aims to lay the groundwork for “advancing global collaboration and knowledge-sharing on AI safety.”

Our report, Weaving a Safety Net, examines how the AISI Network can be structured and strategically integrated into the broader AI governance ecosystem to effectively fulfill its mandate toward secure, safe, and trustworthy AI.

Section 1 introduces AISIs, providing a high-level overview of their purpose and core functions. Section 2 examines the benefits and challenges of collaboration among AISIs while, in Section 3, the focus shifts to outlining the current state of collaboration. Building on this foundation, Section 4 considers potential structures of the AISI Network for enhanced coordination. Finally, Section 5 explores how AISIs can engage with and complement other prominent actors within the global AI governance ecosystem.

Together, these sections aim to provide an analysis of the current state of collaboration between AISIs and other key institutions, and propose strategic directions to deepen these collaborative efforts inside and outside of the Network, enhancing its impact in addressing global AI challenges.

A network diagram of publicly announced bilateral collaborations between AISIs as well as with major AI companies. Line color indicates the primary area of collaboration, as inferred from the most emphasized topic in press releases about each partnership. Line size represents the scope of collaboration, with broader lines denoting a greater number of distinct areas of collaboration. A comprehensive source list for each connection in the diagram is available in the appendix of the report.

Team members

Related resources

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

How To Make International AI Verification a Reality

Countries outside the U.S.–China AI race can build the verification technologies needed to make an international agreement to slow AI development enforceable. This memo suggests research priorities.

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

What compute on European soil might buy Europe and what it depends on

Across Europe, there is growing appetite for locating large compute capacity at home. This post maps what the benefits' proponents claim such a buildout might bring and the key open questions these claims stand or fall on.

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

Buyer Beware: What AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa Reveal About Verification

AI rules cannot reliably protect people when compliance cannot be checked. In a new CIGI policy brief co-authored by George Gor (TFS) and Kofi Yeboah (Mozilla), AI-enabled weapons in Africa serve as a case study of how procurement and regional verification can test supplier claims, reduce risks to civilians and...

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

The Case for Cross-Border AI Incident Infrastructure

AI incidents are scaling fast, and coordinated global governance is lagging behind. This report proposes addressing this challenge through the development of internationally-distributed incident management infrastructure. Our recommendations aim to enable governments, multilateral bodies, and frontier AI companies to jointly detect, prepare for, and respond to AI incidents across jurisdictions.

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

Determining the State of the Art in General-Purpose AI Risk Management: From Code to Practice

The EU's AI Act and Code of Practice requires providers of the most advanced AI models to meet the ‘state of the art’ (SOTA) in safety and security. In a new policy memo, we argue that SOTA is best understood as a process-driven concept, advanced by the broader expert ecosystem.

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

EU AI Act meets AI Agents

Highlights from Tech Policy Press article “The EU AI Act is Not Ready for Agents,” examining how the EU AI Act applies to AI agents and governance challenges.